🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday went somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.